An effort to stand for justice and oppose the "ruinous traits" listed by Muslim scholars in all their forms: rancor, unhealthy attachments, malice, jealousy, vanity, stinginess, avarice, cowardice, indolence, arrogance, ostentation, heedlessness, anxiety, depression, and oppression.
How We Opened The Door To Being Replaced By The White Woman NAACP Scam Artist & Other Nonblack Women Like Her
While collecting my own thoughts about this, I've been watching some outstanding discussions about the issues surrounding Rachel Dolezal (the WW scam artist who masqueraded as a Black woman while heading the Spokane, Washington chapter of the NAACP office). The best conversations and comments I've seen have dealt with how we collectively opened the door to this.
Here's a quote from an excellent recent conversation on THIS Facebook page. I'm not sure if the gentleman speaking in the quoted portion is Ms. Coleman's father, but what they're talking about in this exchange is right on the money:
Abraham ColemanThough this sentiment or prose is in direct opposition to my being black, as Im the product of a white and black breeding, I agree totally. I can see the bigger picture so no need for me to rant and rail about my "blackness" as a mixed person technically because it opens the door for the rachels and zoe saldana to portray nina simone etc. Total failures.
The white person did create the one drop business as a way to "purify" themselves, the black MAN is the black diasporas reason for clinging to the rule. The rule allows for him to sexually poke and prod and procreate with any woman of 'color', to hide his guilt and refusal to survive with black women. I believe runoko rashidi is the best example of my point. Digging for photos of dark asians from 623 BC so the black man feels justified in seeking asian women. Digging for one african ancestor of a white woman justifies.....the phrase "africa is mother to us all", justifies the black mans NEED for NON black women.
The sad part is, the black WOMAN identifies as a black man 90% of the time so she refuses to reject the erasure of HER value and black existence. If black men didnt love non black women so much, this "one drop" rule would have died off by now.
I was stabbing myself the entire time I was typing this post because THEE issue is really close to "home". However, I'm glad you did comment with complete understanding of the bigger picture here. Only the black WOMAN is under attack with this "one drop", "everybody is black" BS because 9/10 the rule rears its head when a non black WOMAN is in question.
Remember that "light skin felon" everybody was harping about a while back? The green eyes etc..? Black MEN were doing everything in their power to reject that dude as black. No one was fighting to include him. He was high yella amd had green eyes. REJECTED! "THAT DUDE IS NOT BLACK! THE BLACK WOMAN HATES HERSELF FOR LIKING THAT MIXED GUY!"
Black men pulled their skirts all the way down during that little fiasco. Precisely why Ive always rejected the one drop rule. It only benefits the SEXUAL and VISUALLY PLEASING PREFERENCE of BLACK MEN. Has nothing to do with anything else.
Abraham ColemanI do recall the "light felon" fodder. Lol. Thats my point. Why isnt "the rock" black? A few weeks ago I witnessed a discussion on whether or not steph curry is black. A discussion involving black men at that. Id quicker claim curry as black than I would rachel dozeal. You see black WOMEN fell inlove with his daughter, (acceptance of curry basically), so the BM had to put a stop to that. "No no black woman, you can like idris and taye diggs. Only we, men, can like zoe kravitz, saldana and j-lo!"
Only the black womans allegiance is on the table. I dont know why the black woman ALLOWS and perpetuates that.
In another conversation on that Facebook page, Mr. Coleman noted that "the Black womanused her last breath to uphold the image of Black men." Yep, that's absolutely correct. Our. Last. Breath. Which is why we're collectively in a death spiral now.
Breukelen Bleu hosted another excellent recent discussion about all of this. She described how BW's hair boards went from celebrating "typical" BW's hair textures to lifting up loosely curled biracial hair textures.
Look! Hair that looks shiny, moisturized with no dry ends or single strand snarls!
AND NOT A MANUFACTURED CURL PATTERN IN SIGHT.
It’s an A-F-R-O.
Just a hairstyle…..
The ONLY act of militancy from wearing a legitimate afro TODAY is doing so in the midst of BLACK PEOPLE!
No texturizing, heat-training required. No Bantu-Knot, Marley Braid-Out, Two-Strand Twist, Roller Set, or a $200 product list and 50 minute DAILY morning regime in sight. The ORIGINAL WASH-N-GO!!! And I believe the fro didn’t shrink in humidity. No number-type categorization, no mixed-gals or poly-racial ad campaigns (i.e. Carol’s Daughter, Shea Moisture) either….
A ‘REGULAR’ BLACK WOMAN…AND HER DAUGHTER.
THIS IS HOW B-L-A-C-K Women and Heritage GETS ERASED:
Please take the time to read Faith's post AND Breukelen Bleu's comment to this post (Ms. Bleu's comment is the first one). Oh, there were quite a few A-N-G-R-Y Black women in the comment section to Faith's post who were peddling that "It's just hair" lie. There were also some upset "tragic biracial damsels" in the comment section playing dumb about their privilege. Well, I hope it's crystal clear now that BW are reaping the whirlwind with that "It's just hair" self-deception.
Ms. Bleu did a recent Facebook post (which appears to be locked now) pointing out the connection between the above situation, the Black hair boards' transition from lifting up "typical" BW's hair texture to lifting up loosely curled, biracial-type hair textures, and the increasing presence of WW like the NAACP imposter (and other nonblack women) standing in BW's space. I agree that it's all connected. Here's what one of my friends said in reaction to Ms. Bleu's recent Facebook post (emphasis added in red bold):
She is correct on ALL POINTS. I left the hair boards around the time we met because of what was developing. The lift up of the "curl" versus our dominant hair textures. Folks working themselves into pretzels to have pictures of a "SINGLE CURL" on an otherwise non-curl hair type of head. All this blond hair wearing, etc. to attract a negrah male gaze that is not looking their way. Those that continue to chase after the purple unicorn will never break free.
Another sign of the death of [African-Americans], because we refuse to own the pathologies that we have and then to really work on them. Natural hair became another "paper bag" test.
As for as the Becky SCAM artist, I hope that they file criminal charges for fraud and make her pay restitution for any scholarships or grants.
As somebody who wore a nappy, natural afro at various times during the Jheri curl heyday of the 1980s, I'm happy I never joined or paid any attention to those natural hair boards.
I'm happy I never joined those natural hair boards for the same reason I ultimately walked away from the Black mosque.
Which is the same reason I ultimately walked away from Black professional organizations.
Which is the same reason I ultimately walked away from [dead] Black community activism.
Because I learned through repeated negative experiences that our collective refusal to address and eradicate our [internalized racism-inflicted] pathologies means that Black organizations will always inevitably devolve into destructive mess. This has always been the fatal inherent flaw with all African-American organizations and pseudo-institutions. Rev. Albert Cleage (he’s writer Pearl Cleage’s father)
explained this in his book Black Christian
Nationalism. Much of his analysis in this 1972 book is outdated and
mistaken. However, much of it has been proven correct by subsequent events regarding African-Americans (emphasis in bold):
“No other Black group [he’s speaking of the church that he founded]
(other than the Black Muslims) is willing to face seriously the fact that Black
people are psychologically sick and have been systematically conditioned to
hate themselves and love their oppressor. Every other Black group tries to
program with Black people the way they are (which is obviously an
impossibility)…”pg.
212-213.
“…in every way we have contributed to our own enslavement. Our powerlessness has
been perpetuated by our inability to build genuine Black institutions and our
refusal to accept genuine Black leadership. Black pseudo-institutions existing
in the Black community (such as the Black church) have actually served the
interests of the White oppressor. pg.209.
I don’t know if
Rev. Cleage lived long enough to see Min. Farrakhan sell out the Nation of
Islam to Scientology. In any event, the mass African-American self-hatred and belief in Black
inferiority that Rev. Cleage spoke of in 1972 is a thousand times worse in 2015. For a follow-up discussion, please see One Less Soldier's (blog host of Not Your Girl Friday) essay and the comments to her post, Imma say it again; Beware the Cloak of Black Male &White Female Privilege!
One of the best gifs I've ever seen is from a commenter named Jane Dark over at the Gender Trender post Identity Politics will be Intersectional or they will be Bullshit. To paraphrase her comment, so-called “transracials” not only exist: THEY LIVE! {heavy sarcasm alert}
The African-American collective’s mass reactions
to several recent events have shown those of us who are self-actualizing African-American
Black women (as I call us, Sojourners)just how EXTREMELY
compromised our collective position is these days.
AA slaves are doing all of this in support of their
own erasure. For any self-respecting AA person, these caping incidents have
been grotesque spectacles.
As Sojourners, we’re looking at the terminal stage
of self-hating, self-destructive cultural dysfunctions that were set in motion
over a century ago; and that were allowed to fester by the AA misleadership
class (past and present). We see this. Now what? It’ll take
several blog posts to unpack all of this. This is the first of several posts
about this topic.
My Qualifications To Offer Suggestions and
Criticism Regarding Issues Related to African-American Black Women’s Interests
Like I said, over the last couple of weeks, I’ve
been appalled watching large numbers of AABW engage in EXTREME one-sided caping
on behalf of various categories of others who hate them. It’s been so way out
that I’ve felt compelled to frequently come out of my blogging semi-retirement to speak
out about these matters.
One of several Mammy Mule/Negro Male Coon Caping For
WW Scam Artist Rachel Dolezal tactics to silence AA Black dissenters is the false
assertion that this WW scam artist has done more for AA Blacks than the dissenters. The Mammies and Coons try to disqualify all critiques of their beloved
WW scam artist by claiming that the dissenter has never done anything (or has
never done “as much”) for AAs.
In a way it’s humorous that AA slaves always tell on
themselves. Do-Nothing AA Slaves always assume that every other AA Black person
is also a Do-Nothing who has never done anything to serve AA Black interests. This What Real-World Experiences Are You Basing Your Opinions On? issue came up in an exchange I had with another commenter at another blog last year.
I’ll repeat what I said over there about where my views come from:
“During the last part of high school, I volunteered
for a Chicago-area crisis hotline called Metro-Help that worked in conjunction
with what was then called the National Runaway Switchboard. Now it’s called the National Runaway Safeline. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Runaway_Safeline
Once other kids at my high school found out I was a
crisis hotline volunteer, more than a few of them (including other AA girls)
started confiding in me about their heavy-duty problems at home (including
sexual molestation). I did what I could to connect other kids with resources
that could help them with their particular issues.
When I went away to college, I participated in the
anti-apartheid movement. I also volunteered with a local crisis hotline while
there, which received a lot of calls from battered women and other women in
crisis. Most people are apolitical. That’s typical. Whatever level or absence
of interest in political issues is perfectly okay as long as folks are cool
about it, and treat other people with basic courtesy. Most of the apolitical
AABW students at my campus didn’t have the “live and let live” attitude, and
were quite nasty toward the campus activist BW.
Meanwhile, when some of those SAME silent,
apolitical, Stank Attitude Toward Other BW chicks I went to college with got
date-raped back in the late 80s and early 90s, they typically had nobody else
they could turn to for help except the campus activist women that they had up
to that moment been telling to “shut up.” At that point in time, there were no
such commonly-used expressions such as “date rape” or “stalking.” Since they
were apolitical, these “Y’all should just shut up” chicks didn’t know where any
shelters, crisis centers, or rape counselors were located.
I’ve never been a saint or a believer in turning the
other cheek, and I have a loooong memory. It took a LOT for me to help some of
these heifers when they were in crisis and had nobody else they could turn to.
I was verrrrry tempted to leave one of them to her own devices when she was in
the middle of her crisis . . . but I still helped them and her . . . I digress
. . .
When I was in law school, I spent one summer
clerking for a local civil rights attorney (who mostly dealt with AA Black
folks’ civil rights/police brutality issues and related legal grievances). I
spent another summer clerking for a local legal aid clinic that services mostly
AA poor folks (primarily poor and underclass AABW and their children).
I spent 10+ years working as a government defense
attorney serving mostly AA poor and underclass litigants in a variety of legal
settings, from child welfare courtrooms, child support courtrooms, and criminal
courtrooms. All of which are mostly packed with AA Black folks as defendants
and litigants.
I’ve also worked as a prosecutor (one of the few in
my office who was more preoccupied with serving justice to all
parties—including the disproportionate number of AA victims and defendants—as
opposed to simply racking up convictions and other “wins”).
I’ve also served AABW’s interests as one of several
early BWE bloggers. I started blogging back in 2008 and 2009. A point in time
when I had to invest in IP-address tracking software so that I’d have
documentation to give the FBI about some particularly nasty and menacing
Internet Ike Turners.
I was BWE blogging back in 2008 and 2009 when some
other BWE bloggers and I had to exchange IP-address information about several
nasty and menacing Internet Ike Turners.
The early BWE bloggers took the heat from the
Internet Ike Turners, pushed back against them (sometimes with the assistance
of law enforcement), and made it safe for a lot of other AA women to start
talking online.
I’m saying all of this to say that when I talk about
the REALITY of trying to serve and advance AABW’s interests, I’m not talking
solely based on ideology. My views are rooted in long-term, REAL WORLD
experience with serving other Black folks and with woman-centric activism.”
In summary, I’M one of MANY African-American Black women who are qualified to run a NAACP
chapter. It’s truly offensive to hear self-hating slaves pretend that there
weren’t any qualified AABW that could do what this WW scam artist has only been
pretending to do: to serve AAs’ interests in that [deeply compromised from its
very beginning*] organization.
[*AAs have an unfortunate tradition of allowing outsiders
to run all over us. Because we’re so frantic to latch onto other people, AAs
traditionally allow nonblacks and foreign-origin Blacks to have command and
control over what are supposed to be our organizations. AAs allowed White
men like Kivie Kaplan to be the head of the NAACP from 1966 until his death in
1975. The NAACP didn’t have a Black president until 1975. We allowed West
Indians like Stokely Carchmichael to run and set policy for our civil rights
organizations.
Throughout our history, AAs have consistently
allowed various types of outsiders to rule over us in our own organizations;
nobody else allows AAs to rule over them in their own organizations. Nobody
allows AAs to set policy for or have command and control over THEIR ethnic
and/or political organizations.
And I don’t blame others for not allowing AAs to
control their critical “stuff.” Only a foolish group of people allows outsiders
to set policy for them. No matter how close an alliance is, or how long it’s
lasted NO responsible government gives its nuclear codes to an allied
government. There are certain things that sensible people keep control over
restricted to themselves. AAs love to give our “nuclear codes” to outsiders.]
Faith DowYou can prioritize whatever you choose. People focus too much on the cop in McKinney not the economics behind it. The adult WW who fought the teen, the WM animal killer who called 911 inciting violence. The FRAUD was and still is being given protection by black males and stupid black women who worship whiteness, but then some folks want to get angry when a few whites don't like us and act accordingly? And then they wonder WHY? If anything McKinney should have been a connect-the-dots moment about why that fraud needed to be shut down and the NAACP should burn to the ground for supporting her. How are THEY going to set any example when they won't clean house. In both situations it is black women and girls who will pay the price and both situations are preventable. But the desired ideal of erasure is to have a "white" black woman. Which is why a darker skinned BW like the teen is still in peril whether a white cop is involved or not. The NAACP just publicly erased ALL black women to coddle a white woman and blacks will keep propping up biracials because black people hate themselves and won't set standards. The fraud used WHITE PRIVILEGE when it suited her to step over black women and should never have been given the keys to leadership based on her appearance, but she was. So, yes IMO McKinney is done. It happened. There are millions of other unprotected BW out there and the support of an opportunistic sociopath like #RachelDolezal is the reason why. Not a white cop.
Babz Rawls IvyHow many Black women calling for her resignation are qualified to sit in her seat? and how many Black women are willing to dedicate their lives to the issues of Black people? How many Black women are prepared to do all that she has done on behalf of Black people. and How many Black women are willing to be as committed to Black issues as her. Yeah be outraged, but ask yourself... what have you done LATELY?
Tracy L. ScottI've done plenty, so have other black women. I don't think there is a shortage of smart educated black women that can do her job and speak from experience of the joys and hardships of being a true black woman. There are scores of black women doing the damn thang every day. Maybe if you weren't so busy caping for wannabe wigger, you'd see that. What the hell are YOU doing to uplift black issues, besides yammering on Facebook.....yeah, I thought so...#lane#findyours#stayinit
Tracy L. ScottI apologize to you Faith Dow, but I lost it....people, black people, are acting like this fraud is the messiah. Like she was the only one that ever took an African studies class at Howard and did work for the NAACP that went above and beyond. This bitch TOOK the job from a black person , a black woman, that could have gone leaps and bounds over here crazy ass, with out blackface. She's a liar, she falsified documents pertaining to her race, lied about her son and her dad, and then went about policing other minorities. But because she gave out the great white gaze and helping hand, that's okay. Shirley Sherrod was fired over here say.....crickets. So yeah, keep mammying yourselves out of existence, me , I'll fight for what's mine.
Now Victoria Rowell is on Twitter posting photos of her (3/4ths at least) white daughter to defend #RacheDolezal
Which brings me back to a conclusion that I've been mulling over ever since earlier outbreaks of caping insanity, including many AABW's decision to cape in
support of another WW's intrusion into BW's natural hair issues and space (the Curly Nikki debacle):
We must remove modern-day, living Black biracials from our AA Black category!
And we have to find a way to do this without distorting our own people's history. Which is why I suggested using the date of the Brown vs. Board of Education ruling as a cut-off point in a recent post.
African women such as the For BW Only writer (whose meme I mentioned—and agreed with—in a recent post) and Kola Boof have asserted that there shouldn't be any nuance with this issue. While presuming to discuss (and debate with AAs about) this AA identity issue, these two African women feel that all half-Other AAs past and present should be categorized as biracial and NOT AA Black.
My question to self-actualizing AABW is this:
Are you comfortable with ANY outsider—including African women—rewriting YOUR AA PEOPLE'S history? Do you blindly assume that outsiders will be sensitive enough to be protective of YOUR people's history?
Or are AA identity issues the sort of thing AAs need to figure out and decide among ourselves?
I keep harping on this inter-ethnic angle because I know my own AA people's history. AAs’ problems typically revolve
around mishandling the execution of what seem to be good ideas. The problems
with the execution of seemingly good ideas crop up because AAs have a tendency
to import the same old, self-hating thinking into any new and good idea.
I keep harping on this inter-ethnic angle to these discussions, because at the end of the day, what the For BW Only writer and Kola Boof are demanding of AABW does not serve to distort or rewrite THEIR respective people's history.
But it makes a BIG difference with YOUR people's history. I haven't mentioned this online before, but here's an example of what they're suggesting for YOU and YOUR PEOPLE is going to lead to:
During the 19th and 20th centuries, a powerhouse of Black American leaders emerged, consisting primarily of men and women with “an apparent mix of Caucasoid features.” The face of the African warrior, brought to America centuries prior from the Ivory Coast had changed, due to ...
Intellectually I know better, but I was still amazed and horrified to see that there's a colored woman who apparently believes that it's helpful to frame our people's history in this fashion. Amazed and horrified to see a colored woman who's so clueless that she can't see how framing our history in this fashion serves a White supremacist narrative.
I already know what the legions of Mammy Mules and Negro Male Coons will do with the AA identity suggestions being made by the For BW Only writer and Kola Boof: They'll take these women's positions (and a book like the one mentioned above) and run with it in an extremely destructive way.
Mammy Mules and Negro Male Coons will use the For BW Only writer's and Kola Boof's position regarding AA Black identity to start peddling the lie that all of our early AA leaders were actually nonblacks. They'll use these African women's positions to start peddling the lie that anything and everything of value among historical AAs was actually created by [biracial] nonblacks. I know my own people's self-destructive mental habits and behavior patterns.
Lest we forget: Yes, many historical AA leaders were more immediately mixed race than most other AAs—this was a result of social positioning and access to education. The
historical reason why so many of our early leaders and accomplished ancestors
were more immediately “mixed” than is typical for us is because those were the
first AAs who were positioned to have access to education. Either as the
slavemaster's direct offspring or as (already) “free persons of color.” In that
moment in history, out of all of us, those were the types of AA Black folks who
first gained access to education.
The productive, loyal tribe members
Black folks that some outsiders are in a hurry to call “biracial” and not AA Black—like
the slavemaster's son Booker T. Washington—used their resources to help lift up
other, NON-mixed AAs.
Why does preserving the integrity of our AA historical narrative matter?
It matters because (1) AAs are in freefall and moving
backwards in terms of self-respect, self-acceptance, and self-love.
Younger AABW’s curious choice to give
their online spaces and conferences titles like Breaking Brown, Blogging While
Brown, Brown Sistagirls, etc. instead of Breaking Black, Blogging While Black, Black
Sistagirls, etc.
Please note that I’m not singling out any particular blogger or writer. There are a lot of AABW using “Brown” instead of“Black” when giving a title to their online presence. I’m mentioning these titles as examples of what I’m talking about. The labels we choose when describing ourselves say a lot about our levels of consciousness and level of comfort in our own skin. AAs have historically had a tortuous relationship to identity. Our kidnapped ancestors started off self-identifying as members of whatever African ethnic group they were members of. That African tribal identity was deliberately destroyed via mass torture and rape. Despite a few holdouts, such as the founders of the African Methodist Episcopal Church (which was founded in 1816), our ancestors abandoned the label“African.” Instead, most of our ancestors began to self-describe as“Negroes” or “colored.” Until the mid- to late 1960s, to be called “Black” was a slur among most African-Americans. With the exception of the Nation of Islam who referred to AAs as “Asiatic Black men and women.” Unfortunately, hypocrisy tainted their efforts at claiming the label “Black” and reclaiming racial self-respect, which I’ll discuss later in this post. Most of our efforts as reclaiming ethnic and racial self-respect and pride are tainted with hypocrisy. It’s a human frailty, but there are some other poisonous ingredients.
. . . It literally took CENTURIES for us to get the word“African”back into our mental self-description.Likewise, it literally took CENTURIES for us to get comfortable with self-describing as“Black.”
Also keep in mind that whatever terms we used to self-describe our racial and ethnic group were used by both AA men and women. There was unity and a perceived shared interest in those labels. Something has changed over the past decade or so. I’ve noticed that younger AABW are running away from the label “Black”and instead using the term “Brown” in giving titles to their online presences. Up until now, the label “Brown” was claimed by Latinos in the U.S.
. . . For the past three decades, AABM in hip-hop and c/rap have been actively degrading Black womanhood in favor of lighter and Whiter women. This rabidly anti-BW poison has permeated throughout modern AA culture. All these younger women know (and have internalized) is an atmosphere of downright rabid gendered racism. All they know is Black women being openly devalued and degraded by the toxic modern AA culture created by hip-hop and c/rap’s warped values. By contrast, younger AA Black males don’t feel mental pressure to run away from self-describing as “Black men”because their identity as Black males has not been under heavy attack from the AA collective.
AABW in my age group are relatively blessed. We were already teenagers when that hip-hop and c/rap mess started up. By the time hip-hop c/rap emerged, our self-image had already been formed by other, mostly healthier cultural influences.
Preserving the integrity of our AA
historical narrative matters because (2) there’s an ongoing, persistent effort
to destroy, erase or distort AA history.
. . . [ ] I was extremely disturbed by this clip in which the fictional head of the historical Universal Negro Improvement Association (which was Garvey’s organization) goes straight from hosting a UNIA meeting in which he's telling members about the equivalent of a “talented tenth” uplifting Black folks to placing an order for $80,000 worth of heroin from White gangsters.
Regardless of whomever the actor involved (and I like and respect Jeffery Wright’s work as an actor) claims to be modeling his character after (a West Indian policy king named Casper Holstein that I mentioned in THIS post), he physically resembles W.E.B. DuBois with that handlebar moustache. That bit about referring to Blacks as "Libyans" is a riff on how the real-life historical Moorish Science Temple calls all Blacks “Moors.”And the writers have apparently used the name of the real historical Black organization, the UNIA.
The writers are showing a DuBois-resembling, historical Black leader character as somebody who peddles heroin to other Black folks. This is a problem because most AA sheeple get their history from TV shows.
In specific terms of lifestyle optimization for AA women, you can see what happens when your history is erased and distorted: People start selling you lies such as the notion that the masses of AA women have always been overweight.
Food for thought until the next part in this series.
