Moriah,
I
think think AA Black folks’ mass addiction to singing “Kumbaya, My Lord” to
other so-called “people of color” (Latinos of all races including Black
Latinos; Arabs, Asians, etc.)—who, in my observations over the years, tend to
be WORSE anti-Black racists than most modern day White Americans—mostly has its
roots in the ideologies promoted by the BM of the Black Misleadership Class.
Furthermore,
I believe that the BM Black Misleadership Class has consistently promoted this
toxic, false and ultimately self-defeating “rainbow coalition” ideology for
many decades because of their great thirst for access to nonblack vaginas.
Frankly,
this mass BM willingness to throw their own group and race under the bus in
their pursuit of nonblack vaginas predates contact with European slavemasters
and colonialism. It’s an ancient behavior pattern that goes back *at least*
over 1,000 years. It’s how the Moors “worked the Black out” of their bloodlines
and ultimately bred themselves out of existence starting over 1,000 years ago.
Furthermore,
I believe that the BM Black Misleadership Class has consistently promoted this
toxic, false and ultimately self-defeating “rainbow coalition” ideology for
many decades because of their great thirst for access to nonblack vaginas.
Frankly,
this mass BM willingness to throw their own group and race under the bus in
their pursuit of nonblack vaginas predates contact with European slavemasters
and colonialism. It’s an ancient behavior pattern that goes back *at least*
over 1,000 years. It’s how the Moors “worked the Black out” of their bloodlines
and ultimately bred themselves out of existence starting over 1,000 years ago.
Khadija
that’s very interesting and something I had no idea happened. I think younger
black women would do well to listen to this as we weren’t around to see most of
this happen. I know you have written in depth about bm leaders who end up
dating/ marrying non black women but have you wrote any post specifically on
what you’re talking about now? Or are you planning to in the future. I think
this is important conversation for younger black women to have because a lot of
us don’t realize (the reasons behind) certain “black” everyone’s welcome policy
only go one way. And that they rarely benefit black women.
OLS,
I’ve
mentioned the historical fact of BM selling out their own people in pursuit of
nonblack vaginas in passing (with specific reference to the Moors) in this
post:
But this ancient problem with BM even predates the Moorish
empire in Spain, al-Andalus (which was from 711-1492). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Andalus This
BM behavior pattern is what made it possible for ancient Black Egypt to turn
brown and then finally tan and off-White (Arabian).
The
ancient BM betrayal behavior pattern is 2-pronged:
(1) BM consistently failed to treasure and protect the women of
their race (BW). Instead, they sold, traded and bartered BW to outsider men for
a pittance. From the very beginning of recorded time, royal African
negro males of multiple eras and kingdoms allowed outsider males to marry their
daughters and other women of their nation. Arab men used this strategy of
marrying into African royal/chieftain families to gain an economic and
political foothold into various ancient African societies.
This
behavior pattern is the very opposite pattern of what winning, conquering men
do! From the book, Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Racefrom 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D, by Chancellor Williams:
For
in Egypt, as elsewhere, it was a one-way sexual process. The ‘master race’
always kept its own women ‘sacred’ and secluded behind the walls of their
homes. They were not allowed to go outside except under guard. African women
had no such restrictions or protection. They were fair game for the men of all
races, and for them it was always open season. [pg. 73]
(2) Whenever in positions of in power and/or affluence, BM
consistently fixate on accessing nonblack vaginas.Back
to the Moors: Conquering rulers typically demand tribute from the people they
conquer. Usually conquerors want the conquered people to pay them in the form
of gold, luxury items, animals or other goods. What sorts of “treasures” did
negro male Moors demand from conquered White Spain? Answer: Access to 100
virgin White vaginas per year.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribute_of_100_virgins
Note
that the Emir mentioned in the above entry, Abd al-Rahman I was the product of
Ancient African Male Behavior Pattern #1—his father was an Arab and his mother
was a so-called Berber (read = African) woman. History is typically “whitened.”
Instead of describing folks as Africans or Black, other descriptions are used
such as “Berber.” [There are such a people known as Berbers, but for all we
know this Emir’s mother might have been as racially Black as the modern day
Black-looking Arabs I saw when I went to Egypt before Mubarak was overthrown.]
Which leads to the next ancient historical pattern: The majority
of the mulattoes/biracials created by Ancient BM Behavior Patterns 1 & 2
have consistently—and viciously—worked AGAINST the interests of Black people.
An example of this is Tippu Tip.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tippu_Tip
His
mother was Arab and his father was a “coastal Swahili” (read = negro male). One
can see from his photograph that he was a Black as midnight. But this negro
male kept himself busy as a slave trader who preyed on the fully-Black
Africans!
From
ancient Egypt to now—in various historical eras and in various countries—most
half-Black and part-Black mixed people have consistently acted as a hostile
race within the Black race. From the same book I mentioned above:
For
while the white man has mingled his blood with non-white peoples from times
immemorial, in no other people was the outcome a hostile ‘race’ within a race.
[pgs. 319-320]
The
reason for this consistent outcome is that from the very beginning, African
people and descendants of Africans have never had any firm boundaries with
other folks. We just looove sharing our stuff with outsiders. A customer review
of Mr. Williams’ book mentioned this:
There
is a reoccurring theme in this book. Indigenous Africans gain power and
indigenous Africans lose power. That statement sums up this book briefly. Mr.
Williams goes into detail to explain how a black Egypt could be viewed by the
world as being white. The answers to this question can be found starting with
chapter two entitled Ethiopia’s Oldest Daughter: Egypt. In this chapter, he
proposes “the mulatto problem” which I feel is key in understanding how the
face of early Africa was changed. When other groups of people came in from the
east the Africans allowed them to assimilate into their culture. There were
many interracial unions, which allowed for a mixture of kin. This mixture of
kin is what lead to the demise of the total black African state. Time and time
of again people who did not have a natural birth right to any African state
were allowed to do so based on marriage or kinship. This is why Mr. Williams
study shows how indigenous African flip-flop control of power so frequently.
Whenever indigenous African took control of Egypt the power was relinquish due
to an interracial unions or kinship not to mention the violence and acts of
war. Again, in many ways this scenario is a reoccurring them throughout this
book. The early African inability to hold on to what was natural his has cause
others to question whether he should be given any credit at all. Mr. Williams
traces what happen and he gives excellent details.
I
would refer everyone to Chancellor Williams’ book. I haven’t read it in over a
decade, and from what I recall the book tends to gloss over BM’s culpability in
all of this. Nevertheless, it’s the best comprehensive overview of why Africans
and the Black descendants of Africans always lose and can never consistently
retain control of their power or resources.
http://www.amazon.com/Destruction-Black-Civilization-Great-Issues/dp/0883780305
